Comments on: An Interesting Answer to the Interesting Answer http://woodmenhillsinfo.com/2010/01/29/an-interesting-answer-to-the-interesting-answer/ Unofficial (and probably biased) Information about Woodmen Hills Metropolitan District Mon, 06 Sep 2010 03:23:53 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1 By: gimmie a break http://woodmenhillsinfo.com/2010/01/29/an-interesting-answer-to-the-interesting-answer/comment-page-1/#comment-257 gimmie a break Sat, 30 Jan 2010 16:14:31 +0000 http://woodmenhillsinfo.com/?p=983#comment-257 Good morning Hillers, You need to make sure that this private debt it not paid for by the district. Keith Moulton was at the district office after word came down. The award is against<strong> Larry Bishop</strong>. As posted on my site as well as this site Larry reaped the benefits of getting free legal representation during the Trial. Larry was <em>Pro Se</em>. He got to ride the coattails of our district. I calculated his portion at 31,000.00 according to the totals I have. Now here's an interesting point. The numbers you got for the trial didn't pass the "sniff test". They broke down the cost and Larry's portion was not added to the total. Thus the low number you received was misleading. Add Larry's portion to the total $62,000 + $31,000 = 93,000.00. This is the reason we are being denied access to the legal bills. I can prove my point in about 4 minutes. I am not attacking anyone, I am pointing out that Larry was defending himself and you paid for it. The board gave Mr. Bishop superman-like reviews. (I will be asking about pay increases afforded at the next board meeting). Good morning Hillers,

You need to make sure that this private debt it not paid for by the district.
Keith Moulton was at the district office after word came down.

The award is against Larry Bishop. As posted on my site as well as this site Larry reaped the benefits of getting free legal representation during the Trial. Larry was Pro Se.
He got to ride the coattails of our district. I calculated his portion at 31,000.00 according to the totals I have. Now here’s an interesting point.

The numbers you got for the trial didn’t pass the “sniff test”. They broke down the cost and Larry’s portion was not added to the total. Thus the low number you received was misleading.
Add Larry’s portion to the total $62,000 + $31,000 = 93,000.00. This is the reason we are being denied access to the legal bills. I can prove my point in about 4 minutes.

I am not attacking anyone, I am pointing out that Larry was defending himself and you paid for it.

The board gave Mr. Bishop superman-like reviews. (I will be asking about pay increases afforded at the next board meeting).

]]>